Hi Peter, Helder artikel. Wij zijn recentelijk druk geweest met een dergelijke setup obv SSG-140’s. Wat mij echter onduidelijk is, wat de voordelen zijn van een Active/Active setup t.o.v. de door jou beschreven Active/Passive setup. Ik kan daar erg weinig documentatie over vinden, los van de instructie hoe het in te regelen. Heb jij daar een idee over? met vriendelijke groet, David Schaap Innosys ICT
Hi, To answer your question “what is the advantage of Active/Active over Active/Passive” : There’s only one I can think of : load sharing/balancing…
Great article. I have tested it & it worked perfectly, now i would really appreciate if you could come up with Active-Active article as their are many of us getting our heads banged with that. I agree with your comments “only Load sharing” but again a requirement is a requirement. I have already gone through the Ch 11, but still confused about redundant interfaces use (which i don’t want to use). Using default route for router ahead. Hope to hear on this soon.
Hello, I’ll see if I have some spare time to squeeze in a short tutorial about A/A.. (may take a while as I am finishing some other projects first)
Hi, I just came across this website while searching for usefull ScreenOS cluster configuration… I actually often have to deal with ScreenOS cluster during my job, and I was just facing a tunnel related route issue on a Active/Passive cluster that has finally been resolved by disabling the data packet forwarding feature (that is enabled by default)… I never had to care about this feature before, and I didn’t find anything relevant in the Juniper technical doc nor in the KB / Juniper community. I know the purpose of this feature for Active/Active cluster but I don’t see any usage when in Active/Passive cluster.. Any idea ? Regards,